Essays in philosophy journal ranking


Review of Contemporary Philosophy

View a list of current and past issues of Mosaic , both special and general issues. Read issue summaries or access issue details including the introduction and essay abstracts. Learn about the submission and peer review process at Mosaic. Submit an essay for consideration using our web portal where you can also check the status of your submissions and reviews.

Find out when new and exciting things happen at Mosaic , such as new issues, calls for submissions, and events. Use your favorite RSS reader to connect to our news feed:. We are also immensely grateful to the patient and hardworking folks at the two libraries where Ergo is edited and published. Our many thanks to Jason Colman, Jillian Downey, Kevin Hawkins, Rebecca Welzenbach, and Kelly Witchen for guiding us through the setup process and patiently handling our many inept queries and requests. Finally, JW would like to thank Kristen Aspevig for her boundless support, advice, encouragement, and sacrifice.

He would also like to blame FH for getting him into this mess, while also thanking him for doing far more than his fair share of the work. The journal would be an absolute disaster without his careful attention and limitless energy.

Get Mosaic

FH would like thank JW for having created Ergo effectively on his own, from the proposal for our publisher to convincing our chair to the expertise in programming to this very editorial, as well as for always resolving the really tricky situations with utmost diplomatic elegance and eloquence.

FH and JW would both like to thank them again for doing all the real work. We have reservations about this ranking exercise, but the results serve as a useful proxy for visibility and prestige, important considerations when assessing the status quo. Notably, a later poll ranking general and specialist journals together had virtually identical results in all respects discussed here. Skip to main content Skip to quick search Skip to global navigation.

Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. Home Search Browse.

Search form

Volume 1 , No. The Need for Ergo Ergo was created in response to a need for general philosophy journals that are efficient, open access, inclusive, and transparent. To note a few of those ways: By partnering with publishers instead of open access initiatives at university libraries, we effectively give our work over to middlemen from whom libraries must then buy it back. This costs those libraries millions of dollars every year in subscription fees, money that ultimately comes from taxpayers and tuition-paying students.

This practice makes little sense now that publishers do very little to disseminate our work, which is commonly posted online, read, and cited long before it is formally published.


  • Dealing with feedback!
  • Coming Soon;
  • courage in to kill a mockingbird essay.
  • parents are the best teachers ielts essay.

By the same means we also perpetuate a model where we are forced to sign over the right to publish our own work to organizations who do little more than copyedit and typeset it often quite poorly. Junior philosophers need to publish visibly and quickly to attain jobs, funding, and tenure. Without clear and up-to-date statistics, authors must rely on word of mouth and volunteer data like that collected by Andrew Cullison to guess where to submit their work and what to expect. And similar concerns apply to other demographic dimensions like gender and ethnicity. When work in certain subdisciplines is segregated into specialist journals, philosophers working in other areas are less likely to see and benefit from that work.

Authors who publish in Ergo also retain copyright. Because they are specialists in the areas of the papers they handle, section editors are well-placed to decide how these manuscripts should be handled. And because editors each handle only a dozen submissions per year, they are able to carefully and efficiently usher each submission through the review process. We do not endorse this policy as a universal practice for all journals.

Some journals seek not only to evaluate submissions, but also to help authors improve them. We agree that there should be such journals, and we applaud the editors and reviewers at these journals for taking on this laborious task. But we also believe it takes all kinds; there should be places where authors can expect to get a negative verdict and move on quickly if their submission is unlikely to be accepted.

Ergo strives to be transparent about its operations in a number of ways. We describe our procedures, policies, and timetable for handling submissions in explicit detail on our website. We also gather and publish statistics about our operations. The first public such report is contained in this document, below, and we plan to continue publishing such reports every six to twelve months on the journal website.

We also make a habit of contacting authors to inform them of the circumstances when we fall behind schedule, or when things go otherwise awry. In some cases, we also consult the author about how they would like us to proceed. Finally, we inform reviewers about the outcomes of review processes they contribute to, so that they know their hard work is appreciated and can raise concerns about the outcome.

The First 9 Months 2. Top of page. For more information please contact mpub-help umich. Online ISSN: Notify me of new comments via email.

https://enaqsome.ga

The Dualist

Notify me of new posts via email. Sign me up! Blog at WordPress. Accountability in Research American Journal of Bioethics 4. Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective , by Gutierrez et al. How should we treat those taken in by predatory journals? Why Open Research , a nice site advocating open access publishing for research Share this post: Click to email this to a friend Opens in new window Click to share on Facebook Opens in new window Click to share on Twitter Opens in new window More Click to print Opens in new window Click to share on LinkedIn Opens in new window Click to share on Tumblr Opens in new window.

Like this: Like Loading April 19, at PM. Stefan says:. Udo Schuklenk says:. Christian Munthe christianmunthe says:. Mark T Hakkarinen says:.

UPSC - How to write Philosophical Essay - दार्शनिक निबंध कैसे लिखें - Anand Sharma Rank 62 CSE 2018

Angela says:. Simon Whitney says:. April 20, at PM. Patrick says:. April 21, at AM. DOAJ says:. April 21, at PM.


  1. rensselaer polytechnic institute thesis.
  2. The Dualist | Philosophy.
  3. research paper transportation engineering;
  4. short essay about aung san suu kyi.
  5. romanesque and gothic architecture essay.
  6. Aaro says:. April 28, at PM. May 5, at AM.


    • List of philosophy journals.
    • essay prompt for college.
    • Contemporary Political Theory.
    • Primary Menu.
    • Navigation menu?
    • Supported by the Human Brain Project, Neuroethics and Philosophy.

    Mark Hakkarinen says:. May 13, at PM. May 26, at PM. November 29, at AM. The apparent academy - Bioethics Research Library says:. November 29, at PM. The apparent academy — Bioethics Research Library says:. March 8, at PM. March 31, at PM.

    ACPQ Rising Scholar Essay Contest – Philosophy – University of St. Thomas – Minnesota

    Where to publish and not to publish in bioethics — the list Bioethics Research Library says:. May 9, at PM. February 25, at PM. Predatory Publishing says:. October 9, at PM. Essay Predatory Publishing says:. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here

    essays in philosophy journal ranking Essays in philosophy journal ranking
    essays in philosophy journal ranking Essays in philosophy journal ranking
    essays in philosophy journal ranking Essays in philosophy journal ranking
    essays in philosophy journal ranking Essays in philosophy journal ranking
    essays in philosophy journal ranking Essays in philosophy journal ranking

Related essays in philosophy journal ranking



Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved